How to Improve DC/DC Converter Performance with Phase Shifting Time Delay White Paper

2021-01-27

In most step-down power conversions, where multiple output voltages are required to regulate off a single input source, the switching regulators can impose high input root mean square (RMS) current and noisewhen delivering point-of-load (POL) power to FPGAs, DSPs and microprocessors. To combat this, designers will typically implement high input filtering (at additional cost) to reduce conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) and/or radiated EMI, and to control the higher system I²R power losses.
Another technical challenge designers must deal with in systems employing audio amplifiers is “beat frequency”, which is the frequency difference between the power supply’s switching DC/DC converters. If the beat frequencies are between 100Hz and 23kHz, the audio amplifier will likely detect them and disrupt system performance.
This article examines how to synchronize multiple DC/DC buck regulators in a Master/Slave configuration using phase shift time delay. Phase shifting multiple converters prevents ON time overlapping and reduces RMS current, ripple and input capacitor requirements, which will improve system EMI and power efficiency.This approach also eliminates the need for high input filtering and addresses the problems associated with beat frequencies.
As you can see in Figure 1, converter 1 is the “Master”, which provides the set frequency for the rest of the “Slave” converters.
Synchronizing multiple DC/DC converter channels is easy and straightforward, but programming the phase shift can be a challenge. Let’s look at a comparison of DC/DC converters configured in-phase and out-of-phase as shown in Figure 2. Both designs use a 3-phase method to provide 24A of output current. You can add more phases for higher current capability, if required. For both approaches, each converter is optimized to 8A. The configuration on the left is operating in-phase, while the design on the right shifted each phase approximately 120°. The three converters on the left will have a peak input ripple of 24A (three x 8A) or 12A RMS at 50% duty cycle. The three converters operating out-of-phase on the right run at 8A or 4.3 RMS at 50% duty cycle.
As previously mentioned, using phase shifting significantly reduces the input and output capacitors requirement. The RMS input current is governed by equation 1.
Where n is the number of phases, L is the output inductor, Fs is the switching frequency, and k(n,D)=floor(n*D), the floor function returns the greatest integer less than or equal to the input value.
Figure 3 shows the plot of ΔI-IN_RMS(n,D) vs. duty cycle.
In Table 1, we see the summarized performance result comparisons between three converters operating in-phase and three converters operating out-of-phase.
A synchronous buck regulator, like the ISL8018, provides a simple, low cost method to implement out-of-phase operation. The SYNCHOUT feature of the master switching regulator sources a current pulse, I-SYNC, starting at every clock cycle. The current source terminates and discharges to 0V after it reaches the 1V SYNCHOUT voltage. The SYNCIN feature of the slave regulator’s detection threshold is 0.9V. When each rising edge of SYNCIN reaches 0.9V, the ON pulse of its PHASE is triggered. Simply adding a small, inexpensive capacitor across SYNCIN to GROUND changes the SYNCHOUT current source slew rate.
See Figure 4 for the Master/Slave circuit diagram, In F igure 5 you will see its logic implementation. The phase shift time (t in ns) is equal to 2.8·C-PHASE in pF.
Implementing the current source is simple and requires only 70mil² die area. You can trim it to achieve ±5% tolerance. Likewise, the threshold of SYNCIN can be trimmed to ±0.5%. The application capacitance is in the pF range, which only requires a low cost NPO or C0G dielectric class ceramic capacitor, with a tight tolerance of ±1%. Therefore, the phase shift tolerance is approximately 5.12%.
As previously mentioned, the ISL8018 can be synchronized from a Master or an external clock. This feature is necessary when multiple regulators operate in close proximity to one another. Figure 6 shows converters 1 and 2, which are operating with frequencies f1 and f2, respectively. The input will see a “beat” frequency(fb), which is the difference between f1 and f2. This fb will show up in GROUND if there is no isolation. The output may appear as seen in Figure 7 where the envelope is the “beat” frequency.
Usually, the beat frequency is very low, especially if same type of converter is used for multiple rails. This low will show up throughout the system. In computing, telecommunication, industrial or medical equipment that include audio, the system’s audio amplifier will most likely pick up the beat frequency noise. As previously mentioned, adding a common-mode or differential-mode noise filter will add cost to the system design.

Renesas

DC/DCISL8018

More

Part#

More

More

White Paper

More

More

Please see the document for details

More

More

English Chinese Chinese and English Japanese

2019/11/27

600 KB

- The full preview is over. If you want to read the whole 5 page document,please Sign in/Register -
  • +1 Like
  • Add to Favorites

Recommend

All reproduced articles on this site are for the purpose of conveying more information and clearly indicate the source. If media or individuals who do not want to be reproduced can contact us, which will be deleted.

Contact Us

Email: