How to Choose the Best MEMS Sensor for a Wireless Condition-Based Monitoring System—Part 1
●MEMS accelerometer performance has recently advanced to the point where it can now compete with the pervasive piezo vibration sensor. Having key advantages such as lower power consumption, smaller size, higher levels of integration coupled with wide bandwidths, and noise levels below 100 μg/√Hz means these MEMS vibration sensors have opened up an entire new condition-based monitoring (CbM) paradigm for maintenance and facility engineers to detect, diagnose, predict, and ultimately avoid faults in their machines. Due to the ultra low power consumption of MEMS accelerometers, wired systems can now be replaced with wireless solutions, single-axis bulky piezo sensors can be replaced with small, lightweight triaxial analog components, and a wider range of machines can now be monitored continuously in a cost-effective way.
|
ADXL356 、 ADuCM4050 、 LTC5800 、 MEMS B 、 MEMS C1 、 MEMS C2 、 MEMS C3 、 MEMS C4 |
|
|
Technical Documentation |
|
|
|
|
Please see the document for details |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
English Chinese Chinese and English Japanese |
|
|
11/21 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA23196-11/21 |
|
|
1.8 MB |
- +1 Like
- Add to Favorites
Recommend
All reproduced articles on this site are for the purpose of conveying more information and clearly indicate the source. If media or individuals who do not want to be reproduced can contact us, which will be deleted.
Integrated Circuits
Discrete Components
Connectors & Structural Components
Assembly UnitModules & Accessories
Power Supplies & Power Modules
Electronic Materials
Instrumentation & Test Kit
Electrical Tools & Materials
Mechatronics
Processing & Customization
