Comparing the Digi® XBee® API with EmberZNet EM260 API
■Digi's XBee ZB module and the EM260 co-processor are similar in many respects. Both are designed to provide an interface to a ZigBee® network while allowing external applications to be developed around their interface. The EM260 offers cheaper hardware than the XBee and provides access to the lowest ZigBee functions. Designing around the EM260 requires some RF design and additional regulatory testing (FCC, ETSI, etc.) than is required of an XBee-based design. Products that integrate the XBee module can avoid delving into RF design and the associated costs of RF testing. Aside from hardware and certifications differences, the other fundamental difference is in the software interface to the product (API). This document provides a comparison between the XBee ZB and the EM260 software interfaces.
|
|
White Paper |
|
|
|
Please see the document for details |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
English Chinese Chinese and English Japanese |
|
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
158 KB |
- +1 Like
- Add to Favorites
Recommend
- Digital Isolator Devices That Can Protect 24 V Digital Inputs & Outputs in Industrial Environments
- Neoway Technology‘s Digital and Energy Headquarter Settles in Yulin, Aiding in Urban Governance and Digital Transformation in Energy Industry
- How to Use Your Digital Multimeter Effectively
- A Tiny RX23E-A Board for Digital Load Cell
- What Is SMU Digitizer Mode and Why Is It Useful?
- Keysight Delivers New Digital Wideband Transceiver Test Solution
- Renesas Releases 2nd Generation Digital Multiphase Controllers and Smart Power Stages for IoT Infrastructure Systems
- The I2S Protocol and Why Digital Audio is Everywhere
All reproduced articles on this site are for the purpose of conveying more information and clearly indicate the source. If media or individuals who do not want to be reproduced can contact us, which will be deleted.